SF WiFi serves customers in the Hospitality, SMB and Hotspots market – but what home wireless solutions? We do support the home wireless market and we have worked for home clients where the SOHO wireless equipment couldn’t get the job done. We refer to these projects as “Monster Home” projects.
Some of the home client specifics:
1. Wireless signal drops out at various rooms in the house.
2. Client also works from home and needs wireless signal delivered throughout the property, not just one or two rooms.
3. 3 or more wireless devices, laptops, printers, PDA’s, iPhone docking station.
4. Limited access to run new Cat 5 cables.
5. Complicated interior coverage issues. Walls, tile, mirrors, granite, multiple floors etc.
6. 3000 to 5000 square footage, multiple floors, or elongated floor plan.
7. They have a cousin, or friend that is a wiz with computers that has tried everything (repeaters) and nothing works.
SF WiFi has gone into homes in Hillsborough and San Francisco that could not receive quality signal coverage. The owners had tried repeaters, running bits of cable, moving access points, but found no reliable solution.
SF WiFi provides a free site survey to determine signal coverage of the property, design access point placement and client application needs. We then submit a proposal to the client of with our design, equipment and installation costs.
We admit clients seem skeptical before network installation “we’ve tried everything” but they become satisfied customers after the project is completed. SF WiFi Monster Home success rate is 100%. Referrals available.
What are we really looking for in a wireless network? Coverage, reliability, stable throughput, no dropouts, and ease of use. That is what SF WiFi provides. A reliable wireless network so you can get the work done, or maybe it is just to listen to Pandora by the pool.
yes any home/site with more than 2000 sq ft needs a quality solution. heavy application use is another reason. bandwidth, throughput all come into play.
and again repeaters arent the answer – that just brings up near far issues, re-associations from client to AP. and cuts the useable bandwidth in half.
nice home!
nick